PO21 - Building a sarcoidosis biomarker roadmap: finding alignment and building consensus at the Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research’s 2025 Biomarker Summit
Elise Hoover (United States)1; Matthew Baker (United States)2; Maneesh Bhargava (United States)3; David Birnie (Canada)4; Ethan Fechter-Leggett (United States)1; Tim Legenzoff (United States)1; Joshua Fessel (United States)1; Mahwash Kassi (United States)5; Lisa Maier (United States)6; Mary McGowan (United States)1; Courtney Montgomery (United States)7; Mohamed Seedahmed (United States)8; Chetan Shenoy (United States)9; Peter H.S. Sporn (United States)10; Greer Waldrop (United States)11; Arthur Yee (United States)12; Tricha Shivas (United States)1; Elliott Crouser (United States)3;
1 - Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research; 2 - Stanford University; 3 - The Ohio State University; 4 - University of Ottawa; 5 - Houston Methodist; 6 - National Jewish Health; 7 - Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation; 8 - University of Pittsburgh; 9 - University of Minnesota; 10 - Northwestern University Fienberg School of Medicine; 11 - University of California San Francisco; 12 - Hospital for Special Surgery;
Keywords: sarcoidosis; biomarkers; patient-centered;
Select the theme: Challenges in Sarcoidosis Diagnosis and Staging
Type: Original Papers
Presentation: Poster Presentation

Introduction: The Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research (FSR) 2024 Research Agenda identified biomarkers as critical enablers of progress in sarcoidosis diagnosis, multi-organ monitoring, and treatment. In October 2025, FSR convened a Sarcoidosis Biomarker Summit to draw on lessons from other disease areas and outline specific scientific and funding priorities for future strategic work. 

Objectives: Develop a shared, patient‑centered consensus biomarker roadmap to guide research investments, partnerships, and infrastructure over the coming decade. 

Materials and Methods: Clinicians, researchers, and patients were surveyed in advance on biomarker uses and priorities. Thirty-four expert clinicians and researchers representing 27 institutions attended the Summit. Attendees included specialists in pulmonary/critical care, cardiology, rheumatology, neurology, genetics, and biostatistics. 

Results: Surveys revealed both clinicians and patients prioritized biomarkers for disease monitoring, with clinicians also prioritizing progression/remission prediction, and patients emphasizing a broader set of needs spanning diagnosis, treatment decision‑making, and quality‑of‑life outcomes. Summit attendees united around key elements from two case studies that could be adapted for sarcoidosis: clear context‑of‑use definitions and harmonized data and assay protocols (solicited by FSR from the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation’s experience in inflammatory bowel disease) and longitudinal cohorts and standardized and shared datasets (solicited by FSR from the Michael J. Fox Foundation’s Parkinson’s disease work). Summit discussions highlighted the importance of aggregating heterogeneous real‑world data rather than excluding it, investing in strategic longitudinal cohorts, and balancing organ‑specific insight, including specimen type (body fluid vs blood) with phenotype‑driven precision medicine (Figure). 

Conclusions: Differences in emphasis between clinicians/researchers and patients on priorities for biomarker development underscore the need for a strategy that explicitly links biomarkers to patient‑reported outcomes and prioritizes consensus where possible, flexibility where necessary, and sustained collaboration across patients, clinicians, researchers, and industry. The FSR Biomarker Summit culminated in a practical roadmap built on shared foundations, intentional infrastructure, longitudinal validation strategies, and a patient-centered path to clinical translation.  

3217_0.png